VOlUME 05 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2022
Nor Sa'adah Jamaluddin
Faculty of Management and Economics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris,35900 Tanjung Malim, Perak Affiliation
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i12-78Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The value of individual employability can be enhanced through the provision of quality aspects of Education. Therefore, the development of constructivism learning models is one of the main drivers to the attributes of students' high-level thinking skills. The focus of this study is to study and present ideas to improve students' high-level thinking skills through the building elements of the constructivism learning model in accounting skills. It is concluded that Constructivism Learning Model as Attributors of High-Level Thinking Skills on Accounting Skills. Previous researchers' findings were also included to support the arguments used in the study.
KEYWORDS:Constructivism Learning Model; high-level thinking skills; Accounting Skills
REFERENCES
1) Angela, S., & Paul A. H. (2016). Effective Learning: A Case Study of the Learning Strategies Used by a Gifted High Achiever in Learning Science. Gifted Child Quarterly 2016, Vol. 60 (1) 63–74.
2) Bakry & Bakar, M. N. (2015). The Process of Thinking among Junior High School Students in Solving HOTS Question. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 4 (3), 138–145.
3) Baskin, S., Iscan, A., Karagoz, B., & Birol, G. (2017). The Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Teaching Turkish as a Second Language. Journal of Education and Practice, Volume 8, No. 9.
4) Bean, J. C. (2001). Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5) Biggs, J. (1999). What the Student Does: Teaching for Enhanced Learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18:1, 57-75.
6) Che Lah, N., Mohd Saat, R., & Hassan, R. (2013). Strategi Kognitif Abstrak dalamPembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, Bil. 1, Isu 4.
7) Chen, C., Fan, J., & Jury, M. (2017). Are Perceived Learning Environments Related to Subjective Well-Being? A Visit to University Students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.001
8) Crowl, T. K., Kaminsky, S., & Podell, D. M. (1997). Educational psychology: Windows on teaching. Madison, WI: Brown and Benchmark.
9) Dumford, A. D., Cogswell, C. A., & Miller, A. L. (2016a). The Who, What, and Where of Learning Strategies. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 16 (1), 72–88.
10) Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom Environment Instruments: Development, Validity and Applications. Learning Environments Research, 1, 7–33.
11) Frey, I. G., Deutscher, M., & Renkl, A. (2018). Student Teachers' Prior Knowledge as Prerequisite to Learn How to Assess Pupils' Learning Strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 227 -241.
12) Hamed, S., Bahari, P., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2008). Korelasi antara Persekitaran Pembelajaran Matematik, Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Matematik dan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Matematik: Satu Kajian Kes. ESTEEM Academic Journal UiTM Pulau Pinang.Volume 4, No. 2.
13) Hartley, J. (1998). Learning and Studying: A Research Perspective. London: Routledge.
14) Hashim, N., Kee, C. P., & Abdul Rahman, M. F. (2016). STOPS: Mengungkai isu Kebolehpasaran Graduan di Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi, Malaysian Journal of Communication, 32 (2), 139–164.
15) Hassan, R. (2017). Gaya dan Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dalam Kalangan Pelajar Perancis. Journal of Language Studies, 17 (1), 125–146.
16) Holden, R., Jameson, S., & Parsons, D. J. (2002). Making A Difference – The Contribution of Graduates to Small Business Success'. Leeds: Leeds Metropolitan University
17) Hugerat, M. (2015). How teaching science using project-based learning strategiesaffects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environment Research.http://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9212-y.
18) Jamaluddin, N. S., Kadir, S. A., Abdullah, A., & Alias, S. N. (2020). Learning Strategy and Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students in Accounting Studies: Correlation and Regression Analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research 8(3C): 85-90, 2020
19) Jamaluddin, N. S., Kadir, S. A., Abdullah, A., & Alias, S. N. (2019). Enhancement of Higher Order Thinking Skills through Empowerment of Learning Environments. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(2), 159–167.
20) Jamaluddin, N. S., Kadir, S. A., Alias, S. N., & Abdullah, A. (2019). Scaffolding through Project Based Learning on the Change of Student Achievement: A Study in Accounting Principles Subject. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(9), 567–577.
21) Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (1996). Models of Teaching (Fifth Edition). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
22) Kaplan, E. J., & Kies, D. A. (1994). Strategies to Increase Critical Thinking in The Undergraduate College Classroom. College Student Journal, 28 (1), 24-31.
23) Kikas, E., & Jogi, A. L. (2016). Assessment of Learning Strategies: Self-Report Questionnaire or Learning Task. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(4), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0276-3.
24) Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining Higher Order Thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32 (3), 131−137.
25) Loh, S. C. (2002). Effects of Combined Strategy Instruction and Attribution Retraining in Mathematics Achievement of From One Students in a Secondary School. Tesis kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
26) Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2015). Academic Self-Concept and Achievement.International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Volume 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.92153-6.
27) Marzano, R. J. (1988). Dimensions of Thinking: A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28) Mohamed, S. Z. (2006). Kesan Pendekatan Penyebatian Kemahiran Berfikir Kreatif dalam Pengajaran Karangan Deskriptif dan Karangan Imaginatif dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan IV. Tesis Doktor Falsafah: Universiti Sains Malaysia.
29) Mohd Saad, B. (1997). Korelasi Antara Persekitaran Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Pembelajaran dengan Pencapaian Ekonomi STPM. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
30) Mokhtar, S. B. (2012). Faktor Persekitaran Pembelajaran, Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Kemahiran Generik Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Politeknik. Tesis Doktor Falsafah: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
31) Newmann, F. M. (1990). Higher Order Thinking in Teaching Social Studies: A rationale for the assessment of Classroom Thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22 (1), 41- 56.
32) Ohst, A., Glogger, I., Nuckles, M., & Renkl, A. (2015). Helping Pre-service Teachers with Inaccurate and Fragmentary Prior Knowledge to Acquire Conceptual Understanding of Psychological Principles. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 14 (1), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725714564925.
33) Onosko, J. J., & Newmann, F. M. (1994). Creating more thoughtful learning environments, In J.N.Mangieri & C.C. Block (Eds.). Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
34) Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies. New York: Newbury House.
35) Panayiotou, M., Humphrey, N., & Wigelsworth, M. (2019). An Empirical Basis for Linking Social and Emotional Learning to Academic Performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56, 193 – 204.
36) Pogrow, S. (2005). HOTS revisited: A Thinking Development Approach to Reducing the Learning Gap after Grade 3. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170508700111
37) Poh, S. H. (2001). KBKK: Kemahiran Berfikir Secara Kritis dan Kreatif. Kuala Lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman.
38) Puteh, M., Adnan, M., Ibrahim, M. H., Mohamed Noh, N., & Che Ahmad, C. N., (2014). An Analysis of Comfortable Teaching and Learning Environment: Community Response to Climate Change in School. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.209
39) Ramsden, P. (1991). A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience.
40) Richardson, C., & Mishra, P., (2018). Learning Environments that Support Student Creativity: Developing the SCALE. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 45-54.
41) Rugutt, J. K., & Chemosit, C. C. (2009). What Motivate Students to Learn? Contribution of Student-To- Student Relations, Student-Faculty Interaction and Critical Thinking Skills. Educational Research Quarterly, 32 (3), 16-28.
42) Sangawi, H., Adams, J., & Reissland, N. (2016). The Impact of Parenting Styles on Children Developmental Outcome: The Role of Academic Self-Concept as a Mediator. International Journal of Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12380.
43) Sanip, F. A., & Che Ahmad, C. N. (2014). Kesedaran Strategi Metakognitif dan Kemahiran Berfikir Aras Tinggi dalam Kalangan Pelajar Biologi. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan, 15.
44) Schmeck, R. R. (1988). An Introduction to Strategies and Styles of Learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
45) Silvestre, T. G., & Landa, S. U. (2016). Women, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life: Self-concept as a Mediator. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, 1–9.
46) Tajudin, N. M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). The Link between Higher Order Thinking Skills, Representation and Concepts in Enhancing TIMSS Tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9 (2), 199–214.
47) Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The Relationship between Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance of Student in Mathematics Instruction. International Education Studies, 10 (11), 78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78.
48) Tessmer, M., & Harris, D. (1992). Analyzing the Instructional Setting: Environmental Analysis. London/Bristol, PA: Kogan Page/Taylor and Francis.
49) Underbakke, M., Borg, J. M., & Peterson, D. (1993). Researching and Developing the Knowledge Base for Teaching Higher Order Thinking. Theory into Practice, Vol. 32, No. 3, 138-146.
50) Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education, 37 (1), 1-21.
51) Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, Cognitive and Affective Aspects of Learning Styles and Strategies: A Phenomenographic Analysis. Higher Education, 31 (1), 25-50.
52) Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society - The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
53) Wang, J. (2015). The impact of learning strategies and styles on the sense of success or failure in foreign language learning, Research and teaching practices in specialty languages. [Online], Vol. XXXIV N° 2 | 2015, diakses pada 30 Mei 2016 dari URL: http://apliut.revues.org/5223
54) Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The Teaching of Learning Strategies. Dlm Wittrock, M. C. Handbook of research on teaching, 315-327. Edisi Ke-3. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
55) Weinstein, C. E., & Palmer, D. R. (1990). User’s Manual of Learning and Study Strategies Inventory - High School Version. Florida: H&H Publishing Company Inc.
56) Weinstein, C. E., Husman, J., & Dierking, D. R. (2000). Handbook of Self-Regulation; Self-Regulation Interventions with a Focus on Learning Strategies. Texas: Academic Press.
57) Wijnen, M., Loyens, S. M. M., Smeets, G., Kroeze, M., & Van, D. M. H. (2017). Comparing Problem-Based Learning Students to Students in A Lecture-Based Curriculum: Learning Strategies and The Relation with Self-Study Time. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32 (3), 431–447.
58) Wilkin, C. L. (2017). Enhancing Critical Thinking: Accounting Students’ Perceptions.Education + Training, 59 (1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2015-0007.
59) Yee, M. H., Md Yunos, J., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Tee, T. K., & Mohamad, M. M. (2015). Disparity of Learning Styles and Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 143 – 152.